Home - NatureMapr Australia

Announcements

15 Apr 2025

Dear NatureMapr Moderator Community,We’re excited to share a new feature aimed at saving you time when providing constructive feedback to contributors.You’ll now see "Moderator Quick Response" buttons...

New priority species lists in the ACT

NatureMapr now receives more records in NSW than ACT

NatureMapr Data Collector 6.2.1 update

Critical nature positive infrastructure update

Discussion

MattM wrote:

9 min ago

The auricles of R. auriculatum occur lower on the lateral lobes. In R. racemosum the lateral lobes taper abruptly into the settae, which would be what has been interpreted as the lobes. R. auriculatum should also have a full row of hairs below the "V" whereas R. racemosum has an incomplete row of hairs (somewhat visible in the pictures).

Rytidosperma racemosum

danswell wrote:

24 min ago

Updated

Unverified Moth (Lepidoptera)

danswell wrote:

27 min ago

I dont think so. Ill try to add more photos

Eucalyptus dives

PJH123 wrote:

1 hr ago

Don, they are close, all of the Phytometra laevis (65) fit into the one BIN ID: BOLD:AAB1918. A group of 25 range in difference from 0.08% to 0.36%. meanwhile Phytometra formosalis (17) fits into 2 bins BIN ID: BOLD:ACF4053 and BIN ID: BOLD:AAB1918 indicating that some of the formosalis (BOLD:AAB1918) are in fact laevis. Of the ones I tested, 2 sets, one from each bin the difference is 1.37% -1.82% very close, but what makes a species? (we are 2% different to a Chimpanzee). My knowledge of DNA is next to nil and I can only compare the available figures.
Of the formosalis, ANICI254-10 and ANICI255-10 belong to laevis BIN ID: BOLD:AAB1918, while the rest are in BIN ID: BOLD:ACF4053

Phytometra laevis

Frecko wrote:

1 hr ago

Thanks, should now correctly show Crowther

Eucalyptus blakelyi